NYC censored anti-terror handbook to appease Muslims, but it accurately predicted radicalization patterns

Leatherneck Blogger

By Robert Spencer
Jihad Watch
April 16, 2017

This is an illustration of the truth about what I said last Thursday at Truman State University: that charges of “Islamophobia” and “racism” are used to hinder legitimate counterterror efforts, thus paving the way for more jihad terror attacks.

“The purge of a report on radical Islam has put NYC at risk,” by Paul Sperry, New York Post, April 15, 2017:

The NYPD has had a stellar track record of protecting the city from another 9/11, foiling more than 20 planned terrorist attacks since 2001. But some worry the department is losing its terror-fighting edge as it tries to please Muslim grievance groups.

Last year, for instance, it censored an anti-terror handbook to appease offended Muslims, even though it has accurately predicted radicalization patterns in recent “homegrown” terror cases. Rank-and-file NYPD officers, detectives and even intelligence and counterterrorism units are officially…

View original post 745 more words

About Brittius

Direct Descendant of, Roman General, and Consul of Rome, BRITTIUS, of the Imperial Roman Army.
This entry was posted in Global Situation. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to NYC censored anti-terror handbook to appease Muslims, but it accurately predicted radicalization patterns

  1. tonytran2015 says:

    In the eyes of the radicalized, they are doing the right things and are terrorized by the governments.

    Lefties believe in hugging them and penalize anyone who upsets or discriminates against them.

    So you have to pay more taxes to support the lunacies leading to your own destruction.

    Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.